Case StudiesBlog
Talk to an Expert
Cybersecurity

Scaling a Real-Time Threat Detection Platform 10x

A European cybersecurity SaaS serving 500+ enterprise clients needed to handle an explosion in event ingestion volume while maintaining sub-second detection latency.

99.97%

Platform Uptime

10x

Throughput Increase

8

Months Duration

Industry

Cybersecurity

Model

Staff Augmentation

Duration

8 months

Team

4 engineers

Key Result

10x throughput

Client Context

The Client Situation

The client is a European cybersecurity SaaS company providing real-time threat detection and incident response services to over 500 enterprise clients across financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors. Their platform ingests security events from firewalls, endpoints, network sensors, and cloud environments, correlating them in real time to detect threats and trigger automated response playbooks.

Growth had been explosive — the platform went from processing 50,000 events per second to needing capacity for 500,000+ eps. The original monolithic Python application could not scale horizontally. Detection latency had degraded from 80ms to over 2 seconds under peak load, violating SLA commitments with enterprise clients. The client's internal team of 15 engineers was fully occupied with feature development and customer-facing work, leaving no bandwidth for the platform re-architecture effort.

The VP of Engineering needed senior engineers who could integrate immediately with the existing team, understand the cybersecurity domain, and execute the re-architecture without disrupting ongoing product development. The engagement required staff augmentation — individual experts embedded within the client's teams and processes, not a separate project squad.

Scope & Approach

Engagement Model & Approach

Envadel provided 4 senior engineers under the Staff Augmentation model. Each engineer was embedded directly into one of the client's existing squads, participating in their standups, using their tooling (GitLab, Linear, Slack), and following their code review processes. The augmented engineers focused on the platform scalability initiative while the client's engineers continued feature development.

The technical approach involved decomposing the monolithic detection engine into event-driven Go microservices, replacing the single-threaded event processor with a Kafka-based streaming pipeline, and implementing Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) for elastic scaling. The migration was executed incrementally, with traffic gradually shifted from the old engine to the new pipeline using feature flags.

A parallel workstream focused on the ML-based threat scoring pipeline. The existing Python-based ML models were re-deployed as optimized inference services with batch prediction capabilities, reducing the compute cost per prediction by 75% while maintaining model accuracy. A new Grafana/Prometheus observability stack was deployed to provide real-time visibility into detection latency, throughput, and false positive rates.

Team Composition

Augmented Team Members

Four Envadel senior engineers were embedded within the client's existing engineering organization. Each specialist was selected for deep domain-relevant experience and integrated within the first week through a structured onboarding process.

Sr. Backend Engineer (1) — Go, high-throughput systems, 10+ yrs

Sr. Backend Engineer (1) — Kafka, event-driven architecture, 8+ yrs

Platform / DevOps Engineer (1) — K8s auto-scaling, Terraform, 9+ yrs

QA / Performance Engineer (1) — Load testing, chaos engineering, 7+ yrs

Architecture & Technology

Architecture & Technical Decisions

The core detection engine was rewritten in Go, chosen for its superior concurrency model (goroutines), low memory footprint, and predictable garbage collection behavior — critical requirements for sub-second processing guarantees. Each detection rule category (network anomaly, endpoint behavior, authentication events, data exfiltration) was implemented as an independent microservice with its own Kafka consumer group.

Apache Kafka served as the central event bus with partitioned topics per event source type. The pipeline processed events through three stages: ingestion (normalization and enrichment), correlation (rule matching and threat scoring), and action (alert generation, automated response). Each stage scaled independently via Kubernetes HPA based on consumer lag metrics, enabling the system to absorb traffic spikes of 5x baseline without latency degradation.

Elasticsearch was deployed as the hot-warm-cold storage tier for event retention and forensic investigation. A custom indexing strategy with time-based rollover and force-merge optimization reduced storage costs by 40% while maintaining sub-second search latency for the most recent 30 days of events. Redis was used for real-time state management: tracking active sessions, IP reputation scores, and threat indicator caches with TTL-based expiration.

The ML pipeline was refactored to run on a separate Kubernetes namespace with GPU node pools for model training (Python/TensorFlow) and CPU-optimized pods for inference (Go-wrapped TensorFlow Lite). Model updates were deployed via a canary mechanism: new models received 10% of traffic alongside the production model, with automated comparison of false positive rates before promotion.

GoApache KafkaElasticsearchKubernetesGrafanaPrometheusPythonTensorFlowRedisgRPCTerraformAWS

Security & Compliance

Security Posture in a Security Company

Working within a cybersecurity company meant operating under the most stringent security standards. All Envadel engineers underwent the client's security clearance process, including background checks and a proprietary security assessment. Access was provisioned through the client's zero-trust architecture: hardware security keys for authentication, device compliance verification, and just-in-time access to production environments with mandatory approval workflows.

Code security was enforced through mandatory SAST/DAST scanning in the CI pipeline (Snyk, Semgrep), dependency vulnerability checking, and signed container images. All microservices communicated over mTLS with certificate rotation managed by cert-manager. Secrets were stored in HashiCorp Vault with dynamic credential generation — no static credentials existed in any environment.

An NDA with enhanced IP protection clauses was executed before engagement. All work was performed on client-provisioned encrypted laptops with endpoint detection and response (EDR) software. No client code or data ever resided on Envadel infrastructure.

Delivery Process

Integration with Client Processes

As staff augmentation, Envadel engineers followed the client's existing delivery processes: 1-week sprints, trunk-based development with feature flags, pair programming for complex changes, and a strict "no direct commits to main" policy. Code reviews required approval from at least one client engineer and one Envadel engineer for cross-pollination.

Envadel's delivery manager conducted bi-weekly check-ins with the VP of Engineering and a monthly executive review covering individual performance metrics, knowledge transfer progress, and scalability initiative milestones. A dedicated Slack channel provided real-time visibility between Envadel leadership and the client's engineering management.

Knowledge transfer was built into the engagement from the start. Each Envadel engineer conducted weekly "tech talks" (30-min internal sessions) covering the architectural decisions and patterns being introduced. By month 6, the client's internal engineers were independently building and deploying new detection microservices using the patterns established by the augmented team.

Results & Impact

Measurable Outcomes

99.97%

Platform uptime over the 8-month engagement period

10x

Throughput increase (50K → 500K+ events/second)

<200ms

P99 detection latency (down from >2 seconds)

60%

Reduction in false positive alerts via improved ML pipeline

75%

Reduction in ML inference compute cost per prediction

40%

Reduction in Elasticsearch storage costs

Lessons Learned

Key Insights from This Engagement

1

Staff augmentation works best when the augmented engineers are genuinely embedded — using the client's tools, attending all ceremonies, and building relationships with the existing team. The structured onboarding process (first week focused entirely on codebase orientation and pairing) was critical for achieving productive output by week two.

2

In high-throughput systems, observability investments pay for themselves immediately. The Grafana dashboards showing real-time consumer lag, processing latency percentiles, and error rates enabled the team to identify and resolve bottlenecks during the migration that would have been invisible with traditional logging alone.

3

Go's concurrency model proved transformative for event processing workloads. The combination of goroutines for concurrent event handling and Kafka consumer groups for horizontal partitioning allowed the system to scale linearly with minimal coordination overhead — a pattern the client has since adopted as their default for all new services.

Discuss a Similar Challenge

Schedule a confidential discovery call to explore how we can deliver measurable outcomes for your organization.

Schedule a Call